Khwe in West Caprivi Innocent
Victims in Cross-Border War

In 2001 the Khwe in West Caprivi had to deal not only with the disheartening denial of official recognition of their Traditional Authority, but also with verbal aggression, harassment, assaults, arbitrary arrests and detentions perpetrated by members of the Namibian Defence Force (NDF), and attacks by Angolan UNITA forces. WIMSA received numerous reports from Khwe community leaders about Khwe being killed and robbed by UNITA rebels, and about Khwe men being arrested by the NDF on the grounds that they had been collaborating with UNITA.

Specific Cases of Harassment of Khwe

The LAC, WIMSA and staff of Integrated Rural Development and Nature Conservation (IRDNC) in the Caprivi worked closely together to shed light on a specific incident in Mutc'ku in the Caprivi in July 2001, in which the NDF had arrested five Khwe men who were alleged to have weapons hidden on an island in the Kavango River. One of the men was Hans Dikua, whose corpse was recovered from the river seven days after his arrest. A Khwe man told The Cape Times that "They [NDF] put him [Hans Dikua] in a dugout on the river and then the people heard a shot."6 NDF personnel claim that he drowned, but relatives testified that Hans Dikua grew up along the river and could swim. They accuse the army of shooting him, and an IRDNC report states that the NDF had "refused a post-mortem and organised for the body to be buried immediately. The other four detainees remain in custody at the Omega police cells."7

The case of 15 young Khwe men who had gone missing after being rounded up by NDF soldiers on 16 August 2000 was filed with the High Court by the LAC acting for the Acting Khwe Chief and 13 relatives of the missing men. The Court found on 5 December 2001 that it had not been proven that the missing men were still in government custody.

Acting Khwe Chief Thadeus Chedau reported to WIMSA on several occasions that the situation in West Caprivi has been less tense since the killing of UNITA leader Jonas Savimbi on 22 February 2002. The majority of Khwe families which had fled to Botswana plan to return to their homesteads soon and plough their fields, and it is hoped that the landmines there will soon be cleared so they can gather food in the bush again.

Khwe Refugees at Dukwe Camp in Botswana

At the request of Khwe elders in Omega current WIMSA Chairperson David Naude conveyed to the Khwe refugees at the Dukwe Refugee Camp in Botswana the message that they should return home. David managed to speak to a few Khwe men on the telephone but was unable to establish the state of affairs with camp officials. The Khwe men he spoke to emphasised that the majority of the Khwe refugees would like to repatriate particularly because a number of them were very ill and were not receiving proper treatment. A report on the situation at the Dukwe camp which Amnesty International headquarters in London had received and forwarded to WIMSA mentions Khwe refugees' suffering due to negligence at the Dukwe clinic, their cramped housing, and social ills such as abuse of women and girls, alcohol abuse and a lot of violence as other problems experienced by Khwe at the camp. In December 2001 the Pretoria-based UNHCR office announced that the repatriation process had been set in motion. At the time of writing a tripartite agreement between the UNHCR, Botswana's Ministry of Presidential Affairs and Namibia's Ministry of Home Affairs was signed. This agreement will guarantee the "safe and dignified return" of Namibian refugees.

San in Tsumkwe West Threatened by
Plan to Relocate Refugees

Namibia's Minister of Home Affairs recently announced in the National Assembly that the Government intends going ahead with its plan to relocate approximately 21 000 refugees (chiefly Angolan) from the Osire Refugee Camp (70km south of the town of Otjiwarongo) to a site in the M'Kata area of Tsumkwe District West. He said:
We know that the donors are opposed to the move. I am planning a meeting between the donors and the farmers whose animals are being killed. Just because they [the donors] give food, they can't have a final say. That is a cheap argument. We are going to move it [the camp].8

Minister Ekandjo did not mention that about 4 500 !Kung living in Tsumkwe West are strongly opposed to this plan. Yet, from as early as February 2001 !Kung Chief John Arnold has been telling the Government and UNHCR Namibia office that his community has serious concerns about and objections to the plan.

First Round of Community Consultations

In February 2001 WIMSA agreed to co-operate with Chief Arnold in conducting a community consultation around the plan. In April 2001 Chief Arnold and WIMSA consultant Richard Pakleppa embarked on a community consultation process to inform the people of Tsumkwe West of the Government's plan for M'Kata, to facilitate community discussions about the possible implications and to gauge what the people thought and felt about the plan.

From 5 to 21 April 2001 Chief Arnold and the WIMSA consultant held meetings with members of the !Kung Traditional Authority, village leaders, members of the N‡a Jaqna Conservancy Committee and women and men in all but two of the 24 villages in Tsumkwe West. They also travelled to the heart of the targeted resettlement area, meaning M'Kata, Luhebo and Mangetti Dune, to meet with individuals and smaller groups of San. At the end of this first round of meetings traditional leaders and conservancy committee members from all the villages gathered for a joint meeting at M'Kata.

The consultation meetings all followed the same format, which entailed sharing information on:

  • who the refugees are;
  • current conditions at Osire, e.g. water consumption of 21 000 people is about 400 000 litres per day,9 and Osire has a sanitation problem;
  • official reasons given for the plan, e.g. Osire is said to be getting too small for the refugee influx and neighbouring commercial farmers have reportedly complained about environmental degradation and threats to their livestock;
  • the Government's plan as a principled decision, not a final one; and
  • the communities constitutional right to influence government policies, and their right to assemble and voice their views.

Discussion during the meetings focused on the advantages and disadvantages of the proposed resettlement of refugees in terms of what it could bring to and what harm it could do to the communities of the whole Tsumkwe District. It was clarified at the outset that the village meetings were not called to make decisions but only to discuss the issues and consider options.


Continue